|
Introduction
The Group 4 Project has an interesting twist
when it comes to your grade: self evaluation and peer evaluation.
What does this mean? It means you get to grade yourself and your lab
partner(s). The way this is done is by confidential email as
described below.
How to pass in the evaluations
Self evaluation: copy and paste the
green table below into an email or into a Word document which you
will complete and send to me.
Give yourself an evaluation from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent) for
each of the criteria listed.
| Name (your
name) _________________ |
|
|
Criteria for Self
Evaluation |
Grade out of 7 |
| I was good at
collaborating with others to complete the lab work - in other
words I did my fair share of the work. |
|
| I was good at
actively seeking out and acknowleding the views and opinions of
others concerning how to do the lab work and how to make the
digital document. (In other words, I used phrases such as "What
do you think?" or "Yeah, that's a good idea.") |
|
| I was good at
exchanging ideas with the others and using those ideas in the
lab work and in the digital document. (In other words, I
tried to express what I thought we should have done but I was
also willing to listen to and use their ideas, too).
|
|
Peer evaluation: for each member in
your group, copy and paste the yellow table below into an email or
into a Word document which you will complete and
send to me. For example, if
there were two other members of your team, copy and paste this table
twice. Give each of them an evaluation from 1 (very poor) to 7
(excellent) for each of the criteria listed.
| Name (your
teammate's name) _________________ |
|
|
Criteria for Peer
Evaluation |
Grade out of 7 |
| He/she was
good at collaborating with others to complete the lab work - in
other words they did their fair share of the work.
|
|
| He/she was
good at actively seeking out and acknowleding the views and
opinions of others concerning how to do the lab work and how to
make the digital document. (In other words, he/she used phrases
such as "What do you think?" or "Yeah, that's a good idea.") |
|
| He/she was
good at exchanging ideas with the others and using those ideas
in the lab work and in the digital document. (In other
words, he/she tried to express what they thought we should have
done but they were also willing to listen to and use our ideas,
too). |
|
Feel free to add any comments about yourself or about
your team members if you think such comments are needed. For example,
if you were absent on one of the days or if you are afraid the other
students might give you a bad grade because you didn't give in the graphs
on time, but in fact it was because your computer had a virus...

What if students are too nice
or too mean in their evaluation?
Obviously, I will check each evaluation to see if I
think it is fair. Generally, students are very honest and they are
good about not putting all 7's or all 1's. I have an editorial
review over these and if I think they are unfair, I will reajust them in
the same way that an IB moderator would adjust my marks if he or she
thought I was being too generous or too strict with my assessment of
your work.
Will the others in my group
know what I grade I gave them?
No. That is why this is done by email and not
by paper in class. Eventually, they will know their final Personal
Skills grade but it will represent several numbers put together:
their own self assessment, all the assessments of the others in the
group, plus my adjustment if I feel one is necessary.
On a final note, please do not ask your lab partners
what grade they gave you! This takes away from the whole idea of
confidentiality.
|